What We Read

I just read Jane Sullivan’s article “A Woman’s Place,” which I would highly recommend.  The article deals with, among other things, the VIDA’s “The Count 2010,” which show the low number of women reviewers and the low numbers of books by women reviewed.  What I find interesting about Sullivan’s article is her discussion of education: since we are assigned mostly male writers to read in school, we tend to assume their point of view as the default.  By turn the female point of view is often seen as unimportant and, that most condemning of words, sentimental.

Growing up I was lucky enough to have a family and a public library that introduced me to women writers such as Lucy M. Montgomery, Lois Lowery, K. A. Applegate, and Madeleine L’Engle.  Still in my late teens, I felt that something was wrong that I didn’t think like a woman should.  I was writing, but I wasn’t writing about nature or love or having babies, which I thought was what girls and women naturally wrote about.  Where did I get that idea from ? Not from the above list of authors.   They wrote about alien invasions—K. A. Applegate—time travel—Madeleine L’Engle— and dystopian societies—Lois Lowery.  In fact,  Lucy M. Montgomery was the only author who focused on domestic issues at all, yet I still felt that I somehow failed at being a proper girl because I disliked romance.

I was either introduced to those authors by family members or I found them on my own.  The books I was assigned to read through middle and high school were all written by men.  The only women I read were Sylvia Plath and Emily Dickinson, and most class discussions focused on their neuroses rather than their writing. Outside of the school, culture was telling me what women should like and that their concerns were trivial.

Often when someone says something is for women they are suggesting that it is of poor quality.  The sad thing is I see woman doing this too.  In passing a woman mentions she likes the Twilight series to which she preemptively say “Shut up! I’m a girl. I’m allowed to like it.”  Basically the woman was admitting that the books were of low quality, but it was all right for her to read them because she was a girl.  I rather she defend them.  Yes a book may be a guilty pleasure, but just say that books is a guilty pleasure.

In my senior year of high school I discovered Jane Austen.  While she is often mentioned as one the few female writers read in the traditional cannon, I never once had to read her work for a class.  I loved Persuasion and Sense and Sensibility.  Talking to a fellow classmate I mentioned my love of her work.  He did not like her work.  Fair enough, we had different tastes.  He went on to say that he did not like her because she wrote about unimportant things: marriage and domestic life.  He suggested that I read Lord Byron. After all, he wrote about important things—like getting laid.  Okay I added the last bit, and I maybe a bit unfair to Byron since I have not read much of his work.  However, this interaction is the kind that causes women to question their tastes.

Last year when the VIDA count came out, I was about to earn my MFA.  I couldn’t help but wonder what I gotten myself into.  How much of uphill battle it would be for me to have a successful career?  If I ever published my book would it be reviewed?  Would I get both female and male readers?  As I’m still at the beginning of my career, I can’t know for sure.  All I can do is keep sending my work out into the world, and to never apologize for writing about what is important to me.


3 thoughts on “What We Read

  1. Yeah- send it! I’ll read it for sure, and as someone who has read the entire works of both Byron and JA and studied both extensively, I firmly believe that anyone who says JA wrote about less important stuff than Byron was either smoking shrooms or just hasn’t developed their frontal lobe quite yet.

  2. Women are often silenced, ignored, or seen as irrelevant to the conversation. Our whole world is structured in a patriarchal system so that women are not included. So, YES, absolutely keep submitting your writing. Keep writing. Keep putting your voice forward.

    I believe that women can and should write about anything they want to write about and if that happens to be marriage, domestic life, and babies, that should be celebrated and valued, but it should be celebrated and valued, as anything we write about, the same amount at least, as what men write.

    Question: If you write something that primarily women read, is it that only women are reading it because of your writing or because of the patriarchal design of the society? I would argue that it is because of the society. When it comes down to it though, you have to write what you have to write and inevitably some people will read it and some will not. Thanks for the post- inspiring!

    • Thanks for your wonderful reply.

      I hope I’m not coming across against domestic life as an important subject. I know that a lot of women authors who write about marriage and babies tend to be treated as though they write unimportant fiction, which I believe is untrue. In fact their writing may be the most important and revolutionary of our time.

      At the same time women who tend to write about subjects that male authors already dominate tend to be treated as strange aberrations. After all, look at all the female horror, science fiction, and fantasy authors who use their initials or a pen name to mask their gender.

      I agree that society is the driving force on why women read women.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s