Reasons to Submit

Vida’s 2011 count is in, and it looks a lot like the numbers from 2010.   Oh there have been some improvements—Granta had more women authors—but overall the field is still male dominated.   There are many complex reasons for these numbers.  A ton has already been written about them, and I am not in positions to try to understand everything that contributes to them.

However, one thing that contributes to these numbers is that a very particular type of male perspective is often treated as the default or the “normal” one, and all other perspectives are in turn “abnormal.”  This may mean that some work is dismissed as unimportant, as has been done to many women authors who write about domestic issue.  Hell, even a writer as important as Jane Austen gets criticized for writing books about marriage.  This bias may also mean that when a woman writes about other topics her perspective is dismissed as unrealistic.  I’ve known non-fiction writers who when writing about harassment, abuse, and assault were called liars by their classmates.   This bias doesn’t just affect women, but men who are of a different race, religion, sexual orientation, or socio-economic status than the “norm.”

I’m not saying that this bias is the only or even the major cause of the low numbers, but I think that it plays a role in them.  Hell, I’ve been guilty of subscribing to this bias, why else would I think, as a teenager, it was weird that I, a female, would want to explore horror, death, religion and myth in my writing?

As I’ve been reading the comments and articles on Vida’s count, I see one point brought up again and again: what are the numbers of women submitting.  This question is a legitimate one, but much to my chagrin it’s often use to dismiss the numbers.  If less women are submitting we should ask why, not claim that there’s no problem.  Also, I would like to note that no one—based on what I’ve read—has compiled actual numbers on how many women submit.

I submit a lot, but now I’m going to redouble my efforts.  In fact, I would like to imagine that whenever a woman writer hears someone say “The reason women don’t get published is because they don’t submit,” she’ll say to herself “Well, I’ll fix that,” and submits even more.  I hope that when anyone—regardless  of gender, race, religion, sexual-orientation, or class—sees that they are underrepresented, that their stories are not being told, they will then drown publications with their submissions.


2 thoughts on “Reasons to Submit

  1. Great Post! I also was not aware of Vida and though I wasn’t totally surprised by the numbers, it was depressing to read through them. Maybe it’s the submission thing, but I tend to believe women are discounted in general throughout every facet of society and because of that, our work is probably not as well received and not accepted or sought out like men’s is. Men editors may also choose men’s voices because we are all conditioned to hear male voices as the authority on life and the world. They may not be aware they choose men’s submissions over women’s and then there are more male editors, so…

    Even if women and men write about the same topics, do they do so in different ways? I think they often do and if there are more male editors, they will most likely pick a man because they more readily identify with him and his style of writing. You definitely have me thinking! Whatever the case, it gives a good excuse to submit, submit, submit! Thanks for the good read! -Liza Wolff-Francis, Matrifocal Point

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s